Please enable JavaScript to use file uploader.
Before deciding to use Respondus, take into consideration the following concerns with using online proctoring solutions:
To address these concerns, Seneca recommends that instructors explore other assessment alternatives to online proctored exams.
It may seem like open-book assessments may not be as academically rigorous as closed-book evaluations, but research has shown that these types of assessments can be beneficial. Open-book tests can reduce reliance on technology and emphasis on memorization, focusing instead on critical thinking, problem solving and application of theories and concepts. In other words, the answers are not easily “Googleable”.
By soliciting peer feedback, students can develop skills in assessing and providing feedback to others. These type of activities also give students opportunities to self-assess and improve their own work.
Related to peer-review activities, group projects can be used as an effective summative assessment. Engaging in group work can help students build industry-ready skills like time management, communication, critical thinking, and collaboration. Consider using holistic rubrics for formative peer review assessments, as well as the summative assessment to help clarify expectations.
Graded reflections can take many different forms, like reflective writing, group discussions, learning portfolios, and presentations. Students can realize the connections between their learning experience and the course content. Reflections can also facilitate higher-order thinking by challenging students to connect their learning to the impact on their worldviews.
Please visit this resource for an in-depth look at rethinking online alternative assessments: Rethinking Assessment Strategies for Online Learning.
Please reach out to Teaching & Learning for more information on Respondus LockDown Browser + Monitor.
Your session has expired. You are being logged out.